pallavi
daya sEya(v)ayyA sadaya rAma candra
anupallavi
dayanu koncem(ai)na nADu talacuc(u)nna sItA sukhamu (daya)
caraNam
caraNam 1
kshiti nAthula rAkayu sammati lEka SrI sAkEta
pati rADE(y)ana vaccun(a)nina satiki kalgina(y)Anandamu (daya)
pallavi
daya sEyavayyA sadaya rAma candra
Do condescend (daya seyu), O Merciful (sadaya) Lord (ayya) (sEyavayyA) SrI rAma candra!
anupallavi
dayanu koncemaina nADu talacucu-unna sItA sukhamu (daya)
A O Merciful Lord SrI rAma candra! Do condescend to show at least (aina) a little (koncemu) (koncemaina) of that comfort (sukhamu) derived by sItA who, that day (nADu) was (unna) expecting (talacucu) (talacucunna) (literally contemplating) Your grace (dayanu).
caraNam
caraNam 1
kshiti nAthula rAkayu sammati lEka SrI sAkEta
pati rADE-ana vaccunu-anina satiki kalgina-Anandamu (daya)
O Merciful Lord SrI rAma candra! Do condescend to bestow on me that joy (Anandamu) felt (kalgina) (kalginayAnandamu) by sItA – the virtuous woman (sati) (satiki) – who
being not (lEka) quite happy with (sammati) (literally agreeable) the arrival (rAkayu) of (other) kings – Lords (nAthula) of Earth (kshiti) - (for svayam-vara),
on enquiring (ana) whether SrI rAma – the Lord (pati) of sAkEta – would not come (rADE) (rADEyana),
when (she was) told that (anina) ‘He would surely come’ (vaccunu) (vaccunanina).
Notes
Variations - (Pathanthara)
References
Comments
1 – mrokkukoni brOvu vELa – There is some doubt about translation of these words in the context.
The episodes related by SrI tyAgarAja – sItA thinking of SrI rAma even before marriage, her anticipation of SrI rAma for the svayamvara (selection of suitor), her anxiety that SrI rAma might not come and her apprehension that SrI rAma might not be able to succeed in bending the bow – all these are not part of SrImad vAlmIki rAmAyaNa. Please refer to – SrImad vAlmIki rAmAyaNa, bAla kANDa, Chapters 66 and 67
The tamizh poet 'kamban' in his version of rAmAyaNa (kamba rAmAyaNa) describes the encounter of SrI rAma and sItA before the svayamvara at that time when sItA was standing at the upper floor (ubbarigai) of the palace and SrI rAma was entering the town of mithilA along with lakshmaNa and sage viSvAmitra. He states ‘aNNalum nOkkinAn avaLum nOkkinAL’ – rAma and sItA looked at each other.
It is worth noting that instead of SrI tyAgarAja enacting the role of prahlAda, it is the latter who is seen enacting the role of SrI tyAgarAja. Such bhAva is seen in other kRtis of this dance-drama also.
This kRti is part of dance-drama ‘prahlAda bhakti vijayaM’.
Top